Pico 2.0 compatibility with 1.3?

[Stanczak Group]

I notice that 2.0 doesn't look the same as 1.3. Is there a compatibility
document? Should I be using 2.0 on new projects to minimize changes
during migration.
--
Justin Stanczak
Stanczak Group
812-735-3600

"All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing."
Edmund Burke


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list please visit:

http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email

[Jörg Schaible]

Post by Stanczak Group
I notice that 2.0 doesn't look the same as 1.3. Is there a compatibility
document? Should I be using 2.0 on new projects to minimize changes
during migration.

Paul might correct me, but Pico 2.x is really in the flux and I would not
recommend it now for production. E.g. large parts of the framework do not
use generics yet. So API changes have to be expected.

- Jörg



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list please visit:

http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email

[Stanczak Group]

I started using the 2.0 beta. How long will it be before it's out?

Post by Jörg Schaible

Post by Stanczak Group
I notice that 2.0 doesn't look the same as 1.3. Is there a compatibility
document? Should I be using 2.0 on new projects to minimize changes
during migration.

Paul might correct me, but Pico 2.x is really in the flux and I would not
recommend it now for production. E.g. large parts of the framework do not
use generics yet. So API changes have to be expected.
- Jörg
---------------------------------------------------------------------
http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email

--
Justin Stanczak
Stanczak Group
812-735-3600

"All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing."
Edmund Burke


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list please visit:

http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email

[Mauro Talevi]

Post by Stanczak Group
I notice that 2.0 doesn't look the same as 1.3. Is there a compatibility
document? Should I be using 2.0 on new projects to minimize changes
during migration.

Pico 2.x is not designed to be compatible with 1.x, although the main interfaces have not changed
drammatically (some may have moved package location).

It requires JDK 1.5+ and introduces new builder concepts - as documented on website.

I would recommend you assess the impact on your projects before migrating to 2.x.
In particular, only Pico Core and Gems modules have been released.

Cheers


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list please visit:

http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email

[Stanczak Group]

Because my project will not be production for a long time I'm going to
go with 2.0 in hopes it will be out by the time I'm ready. I already
began using the beta and all seem like it's working well. Thanks.

Post by Mauro Talevi

Post by Stanczak Group
I notice that 2.0 doesn't look the same as 1.3. Is there a
compatibility document? Should I be using 2.0 on new projects to
minimize changes during migration.

Pico 2.x is not designed to be compatible with 1.x, although the main
interfaces have not changed drammatically (some may have moved package
location).
It requires JDK 1.5+ and introduces new builder concepts - as
documented on website.
I would recommend you assess the impact on your projects before migrating to 2.x.
In particular, only Pico Core and Gems modules have been released.
Cheers
---------------------------------------------------------------------
http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email

--
Justin Stanczak
Stanczak Group
812-735-3600

"All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing."
Edmund Burke


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list please visit:

http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email

[Paul Hammant]

I'd release Pico2 tomorrow if I could, but the rest of the team is
holding me back (wisely).

It won't be long now.

- Paul

Post by Stanczak Group
Because my project will not be production for a long time I'm going
to go with 2.0 in hopes it will be out by the time I'm ready. I
already began using the beta and all seem like it's working well.
Thanks.

Post by Mauro Talevi

Post by Stanczak Group
I notice that 2.0 doesn't look the same as 1.3. Is there a
compatibility document? Should I be using 2.0 on new projects to
minimize changes during migration.

Pico 2.x is not designed to be compatible with 1.x, although the
main interfaces have not changed drammatically (some may have
moved package location).
It requires JDK 1.5+ and introduces new builder concepts - as
documented on website.
I would recommend you assess the impact on your projects before migrating to 2.x.
In particular, only Pico Core and Gems modules have been released.
Cheers
---------------------------------------------------------------------
http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email

--
Justin Stanczak
Stanczak Group
812-735-3600
"All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing."
Edmund Burke
---------------------------------------------------------------------
http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list please visit:

http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email

[Stanczak Group]

Cool. Can't wait. Thanks.

Post by Paul Hammant
I'd release Pico2 tomorrow if I could, but the rest of the team is
holding me back (wisely).
It won't be long now.
- Paul

Post by Stanczak Group
Because my project will not be production for a long time I'm going
to go with 2.0 in hopes it will be out by the time I'm ready. I
already began using the beta and all seem like it's working well.
Thanks.

Post by Mauro Talevi

Post by Stanczak Group
I notice that 2.0 doesn't look the same as 1.3. Is there a
compatibility document? Should I be using 2.0 on new projects to
minimize changes during migration.

Pico 2.x is not designed to be compatible with 1.x, although the
main interfaces have not changed drammatically (some may have moved
package location).
It requires JDK 1.5+ and introduces new builder concepts - as documented on website.
I would recommend you assess the impact on your projects before migrating to 2.x.
In particular, only Pico Core and Gems modules have been released.
Cheers
---------------------------------------------------------------------
http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email

--
Justin Stanczak
Stanczak Group
812-735-3600
"All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing."
Edmund Burke
---------------------------------------------------------------------
http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email

---------------------------------------------------------------------
http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email

--
Justin Stanczak
Stanczak Group
812-735-3600

"All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing."
Edmund Burke


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list please visit:

http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email